Yes, you respond, almost as a reflex. I will posit here that there are several
factors that might run counter to this response. You might be open minded, fair, intelligent,
questioning, well read and quite rigorous in your decision making process and
yet come up short. Critical Thinking
does require all of these traits but let’s take a look at some more factors
that can put you behind a very dark glass, or worse, inside of a very black
box.
Are You Examining and Reexamining Your Assumptions?
For example you may be starting with the assumption that we
in America live in a participatory democracy.
Yes, it has its faults but it is the greatest democracy in the history
of the world and it is the best that we can hope for. We need to strive to tweak the system by
working for change, voting for our brand of politician, and speaking out
against corruption. Someone else might
laugh and say, you are naïve. We live
under an Oligarchy and we are participating in a superficial form of sham democracy
and the general population is seriously deluded with almost no understanding of
what an Oligarchy is let alone that we are living under one. How would you even begin to reconcile these
two views?
Getting into a heated argument will not qualify as Critical
Thinking. Rather we need to uncover some
strategies to take us to a new level of challenging our assumptions. We will return to this below.
Are You Asking The Right Questions?
It is possible that asking to what degree we are operating
in a democracy, a political consideration, is not the best question to get us
where we want to go. We could start with
an ethical question: how can we deal the problem of greed and self interest? Or we could ask an economic question: what is
causing the growing disparity in incomes and wealth? Or we could ask a
financial question: how does the 100 year old debt based monetary system skew
free enterprise? Or a legal question:
how does contract law trump national sovereignty?
Wait a minute you say, this is getting way too complex. I would respond with this:
“I would not give a fig for the simplicity this side of
complexity, but I would give my life for the simplicity on the other side of
complexity.” – Oliver Wendell Holmes
The journey to the other side requires a lot of effort.
Do You Know Your History?
I would suggest that we know far too much trivia and not
enough about the history of political organization, the history of money, the
history of the commons, the history of innovation, patent law, contract law,
mining rights, systematic exploitation, religion, imperialism, anti-trust
legislation, banking, etc. The list is
long and arduous.
There are not enough people who have a sufficient grasp of
history to support healthy discourse that would rise to the level of Critical
Thinking. We have a lot of really smart
specialized people who are not fully educated.
Without a firm foundation in history, Critical Thinking is impossible.
Do You Understand the Present?
We suffer from an explosion of information that is
impossible to fully encompass into our framework. And so we come to rely upon various sources
that we trust. And we separate ourselves
further and further from the source. The
so called Main Stream Media (MSM) becomes the arbiter of knowledge and custom for
most and the population at large flounders in an ignorance that serves the
interests of the few. It is ironic that
the free flow of vast quantities of information is masking the manipulation of
the memes that dictate outcomes.
So ask yourself the question: am I digging it out or am I
surfing the web?
Shaping Our Strategies
I maintain that there are more than enough honest self
proclaimed Critical Thinkers out there to transform our world in short order,
if we would take our game to a higher level.
As it is we are stuck in boxes with labels and spend a lot of time
flailing in frustration against the myriad systems that entrap us. We cluster around our particular causes that
promote something near and dear to our hearts: less government, more
government, an end to human trafficking, global warming, poverty and hunger,
lower taxes, universal healthcare or cleaner air. We are not bad to do so.
However, we could seek to formulate a strategy that changes
the way things are done. We could doubt
the very foundations of the systems that we have come to accept as
inevitable. And in our doubting we could
imagine a world that honors our humanity.
I return to the tag line for this blog:
“The opportunity to shape the artifacts of our lives into
forms that align our goals with our values and complete our humanity has never
been greater.”
But it is a steep mountain of complexity to climb to get to
the simplicity on the other side.
4 comments:
Thank you for this entry. So why do you think the opportunity has never been greater for change on a significant level? I don't understand your juxtaposiing the severity of our ignorance with this claim of hopefulness. Who is helping to advance the ball down the field, carry the torch, for significant change in your view?
A great question. Two things come to mind. One is that we have a lot of tools at our disposal to learn history, explore questions that other smart people are asking, etc. What is needed is the will to set aside long held assumptions. Second is that I am of the opinion that things are going to change a lot in the coming months and years. I do not think that the dollar can be propped up and the price of gold smashed down for much longer. Part of me hopes I am wrong and part of me says let's get it over with and pick up the pieces and move on.
So I am not sure I am optimistic about people studying the life insurance driven origins of the Fed (1903 to 1913), or the long (120 years plus) battle reformers have fought to keep banking, insurance and finance from locking arms with interlocking boards, but I do sense a rising frustration level that could translate into some new thinking.
Another response to your question can be found in my book The Silver Bell where I expound on the idea of Fusion Enterprises arising at the grass roots level to replace debt based Ponzi schemes with credit based human endeavors.
As to advancing the ball... I think local. Planting a garden, a step almost everyone can take, arises out of my Critical Thinking process. That is not to say that you are wrong if you don't plant a garden. Your process can be quite different from mine. I like the Transition City movement but am wary of anything too organized as it tends toward oligarchy (see my blog entry on revolution). I support people who are fighting for food choice.
My biggest fear is that we will suffer a crisis only to have the same players with different banners defining the next stage.
Hi, I just wanted to point out we are (supposed to be) a republic, not a democracy. Democracy is essentially mob rule, and wouldn't be a lot of fun for what could be a large percentage of the population.
Enjoying the blog very much. Hoping for some new entries soon.
Post a Comment